VARIANT FOR CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR OR RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING

In the XXI century moral depreciation concept comprises not only deterioration of outside appearance of construction elements in the course of time but accelerated fashion changes in respect of interior design and rapid increase in technical level for residence buildings. For this reason if average rate of building dilapidation in the buildings of series 1–335, 1–335А and 1–464А constructed in Minsk within the period of 1957–1975 and being operated till 2005–2006 has constituted 25–29 % and their moral depreciation has been equal to more than 40 % then rate of the moral depreciation has significantly increased in the XXI century. Such situation requires execution of special investigations. High operating rates of refinancing have led to the necessity for record keeping of initial expenses and repairability levels because selection of building construction, repair or reconstruction variant depends on these parameters. Repairability classification of main elements of residence buildings and premises has been proposed for regulation of such selection procedure. In this case it is recommended to take into account technological effectiveness of repair and technical service, verifiability, accessibility, easy dismountability, substitutability and interchangeability of construction elements and technical devices. The paper presents nomograms that permit to make easier practical calculations on determination of cost-efficient time period for operation of the element prior to its substitution at various refinancing rates and also for comparison of relative initial expenses according to time service. 

1. Pilipenko V. M. (2007) Complex reconstruction of industrial and residential housing development. Minsk, Adukatsiya i Vykhavanne. 280 (in Russian).

2. Big Construction Terminological Reference-Dictionary. Minsk, Publishing House “Minsktipproyekt”, 2008. 812 (in Russian).

3. Methodology for determination of physical wear of civic buildings. Moscow, RSFSR [Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic] Ministry of Communal Services, 1970. 39 (in Russian).

4. ??P 45-3.02-230–2010. Residential houses for single family and as row house buildings. Minsk, Publishing House “Stroytekhnorm”, 2011. 30 (in Russian).

5. Martynov G. K., Poplavsky O. F. (1983) Standardization in terminology of reliability theory. Moscow, Znanie, 49–93 (in Russian).

6. VSN 53–86 (?) [Departmental Building Standards]. Rules on evaluation of physical wear of residential buildings. ?oscow, Gosgrazhdanstroy, 1988. 72 (in Russian).

7. ??P 45-1.04-119–2008 (02250). Buildings and structures. Assessment of physical wear rate. Minsk, Minstroyarkhitektura, 2009. 44 (in Russian).

8. Kolotilkin B. M. (1989) Reliability in operation of residential buildings. Moscow, Stroyizdat. 370 (in Russian).

9. Buildings and constructed assets. Planning of durability. Part 1. General principles and structures: ISO 15686. Minsk, Stroytekhnorm, 2011. 21 (in Russian).

10. Buildings and constructed assets. Planning of durability. Part 2. Methods for forecasting of durability: ISO 15686. Minsk, Stroytekhnorm, 2011. 30 (in Russian).

11. Buildings and constructed assets. Planning of durability. Part 3. Control and Observation: ISO 15686. Minsk, Stroytekhnorm, 2012. 62 (in Russian).

12. Osipov S. N., Pozdniakov D. A. (2015) On assessmnent of physical wear in elements of technical devices. Nauka i Tekhnika [Science and Technique], (2), 23–30 (in Russian).

13. Osipov S. N., Pozdniakov D. A. (2015) On assessment of dilapidation in elasto-plastic elements of buildings. Nauka i Tekhnika [Science and Technique], (6), 30–36 (in Russian).

14. Karnitsky N. B. (1999) Synthesis of reliability and economical efficiency for heat-power equipment of Thermal Power Station. Minsk, Publishing House “VUZ-UNITI”. 224 (in Russian).