Experimental Investigation of Impact of Working Fluid and Pipe Material on Heat Pipe Performance

A passive device, the heat pipe has the capacity to transfer massive volumes of heat over small cross-sectional areas at extremely small temperature differentials heat pipes are extensively employed in many engineering applications owing to their exceptional efficiency in heat transfer, enabling the transmission of heat over considerable distances while minimizing temperature fluctuations. It is a heat transmission technique that is becoming more and more useful. The fundamental design of a heat pipe consists of an empty chamber placed after a cylinder or square filled with a vaporizable working fluid. This technique of heat transfer is used in solar water heaters, computers, solar power boards, laptops, mobile devices, and electronic circuits. Devices that require a large volume of heat transformations and heat management greatly benefit from the usage of heat pipes. This study investigates the influence of working fluid and pipe material on the performance of heat pipes. The researchers developed a complete experimental configuration to examine the performance attributes of heat pipes, encompassing thermal conductivity, heat transfer coefficient, and overall efficiency. The study examined a range of working fluids, including water, aceton, and ethnol, as well as different pipe materials such as copper, aluminium, and brass. The findings demonstrate notable disparities in performance indicators depending on the selection of the working fluid and pipe material. The entire heat transfer capability is significantly influenced by the thermal conductivity of the working fluid, whereby specific fluids demonstrate higher performance compared to others. The heat transfer efficiency is significantly influenced by the thermal conductivity and surface characteristics of the pipe material. Furthermore, the compatibility between the working fluid and pipe material significantly influences the long-term reliability and durability of heat pipes. Corrosion, material degradation, and phase change characteristics are critical factors that must be carefully considered when selecting the optimal combination of working fluid and pipe material. This study provides valuable insights into the design and optimization of heat pipes for various thermal management applications, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate working fluids and pipe materials to enhance performance and reliability.

1. Choi S. (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Proceedings of the ASME 1995 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Developments and Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows. San Francisco, California, USA, November 12–17, 1995. 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE1995-0926

2. Assael M., Chen C., Metaxa N., and Wakeham W. (2004) Thermal Conductivity of Suspensions of Carbon Nanotubes in Water. International Journal of Thermophysics, 25 (4), 971–985. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ijot.0000038494.22494.04

3. Faiz F., Zahir E. (2014) A Comparative Study of Nano Fluids for Tuneable Filter Operation. International Journal of Engineering Research, 3 (1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.17950/ijer/v3s1/103

4. Hone J. (2004) Carbon Nanotubes: Thermal Propertiesǁ. Schwarz J. A., Contescu C. I., Putyera K. (eds). Dekker Encyclopaedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. New York, M. Dekker https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439834398.ch26

5. Li Y., Zhou J., Tung S., Schneider E., Xi S. (2009) A Review on Development of Nano Fluid Preparation and Characterization. Powder Technology, 196 (2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.07.025

6. Lin Z., Wang S., Shirakashi R., Winston Zhang L. (2013) Simulation of a Miniature Oscillating Heat Pipe in Bottom Heating Mode Using CFD with Unsteady Modeling. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 57 (2), 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.09.007

7. Lips S., Lefèvre F. (2014) A General Analytical Model for the Design of Conventional Heat Pipe. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 72, 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.12.068

8. Lips S., Lefebvre F., Bonjour J. (2010) Investigation of Evaporation and Condensation Processes Specific to Grooved Flat Heat Pipe. Frontiers in Heat Pipe, 1 (2), https://doi.org/10.5098/fhp.v1.2.3001

9. Lips S., Lefebvre F., Bonjour J. (2010) Thermo Hydraulic Study of a Flat Plate Heat Pipe by Means of Confocal Microscopy : Application to a 2D Capillary Structure. Journal of Heat Transfer, 132 (11), 019008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001930

10. Lips S., Lefebvre F., Bonjour J. (2011) Physical Mechanisms Involved in Grooved Flat Heat Pipe : Experimental and Numerical Analyses. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 50 (7), 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.02.008

11. Liu Z.-H., Li Y.-Y. (2012) A New Frontier of Nano Fluid Research–Application of Nano Fluids in Heat Pipe. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 55 (23–24), 6786–6797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.086

12. Liu X., Chen Y. (2013) Transient Thermal Performance Analysis of Micro Heat Pipe. Applied Thermal Engineering, 58 (1–2), 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.04.025

13. Macgregor R. W., Kew P. A., Reay D. A. (2013) Investigation of Low Global Heating Potential Working Fluids for a Closed Two-Phase Thermo Siphon. Applied Thermal Engineering, 51 (1–2), 917–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.10.049