Features of the Stress State of Composite Reinforcement during Tensile Tests
https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2024-23-6-492-499
Abstract
The purpose of the work is to establish the characteristics of the stress state of composite building reinforcement during tensile tests, caused by errors in the centering of the composite rod when installed in anchor couplings. A calculation scheme and a corresponding differential equation describing the stress-strain state of the rod have been compiled. Analytical dependencies were obtained to determine the bending moment and the stresses caused by it. A calculation estimate of bending stresses was made in comparison with the nominal tensile stresses of the rod. It is shown that bending stresses are unevenly distributed along the length of the rod and reach their highest values near the ends of the test couplings. Bending stresses increase in proportion to the eccentricity of the installation of the rod in the test anchor couplings and decrease with increasing length of the rod working part. Using the example of fiberglass reinforcement with a nominal diameter of 6 mm, manufactured in accordance with СТБ (STB) 1103–98, a calculation estimate of these stresses was made for a wide range of changes in the eccentricity of the composite rod in the anchor couplings location and the length of the working part of the test sample. It is shown that the use of short samples should be accompanied by an increase in the accuracy of rod centering in test anchor couplings. A method convenient for engineering calculations is proposed for determining bending stresses and total stresses in a composite rod. The research results can be used in engineering practice and in the educational process when training specialists in construction and chemical technology.
About the Authors
V. G. Barsukov
Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno
Belarus
Belarus
Grodno
A. G. Lezhava
Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno
Belarus
Belarus
Grodno
E. A. Evseeva
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus
Belarus
Address for correspondence:
Evseeva Elena A.–
Belarusian National Technical University
146а, Nezavisimosty Ave.,
220014, Minsk, Republic of Belarus.
Тел.: + 375 17 239-93-04
vm3_ftk@bntu.by
References
1. ACI 440.1R–06. Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with FRP bars. Detroit, American Concrete Institute (ACI). 2006. 44.
2. CAN/CSA-S806-02 (R2007) Design and Construction of Building Components with Fibre-Reinforced Polymers. Canadian Standards Association, 2012. 206.
3. Benmokrane B., El-Salakawy E., Cherrak Z., Wiseman A. (2004) Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite Bars for the Structural Concrete Slabs of a Public Works and Government Services Canada Parking Garage. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 31 (5), 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1139/l04-049.
4. Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE) (1997) Recommendation for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures Using Continuous Fiber Reinforcing Materials. Concrete Engineering, Series 23. Tokyo, JSCE. 199.
5. Seo D.-W., Park K.-T., You Y.-J., Lee S.-Y. (2016) Experimental Investigation for Tensile Performance of GFRP-Steel Hybridized Rebar. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9401427.
6. Cui Y., Cheung M. M. S., Noruziaan B., Lee S., Tao J. (2008) Development of Ductile Composite Reinforcement Bars for Concrete Structures. Materials and Structures, 41 (9), 1509–1518. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9344-8.
7. CNR-DT 203/2006. Guide for the Design and Construction of Concrete Structures Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars. Rome, Italian National Research Council (CNR), 2006. 35.
8. Jarek B., Kubik A. (2015) Zastosowanie Prętόw Zbrojeniowych z Włόkna Szklanego (GFRP) w Budownictwie. Przegląd Budowlany, (12), 21–26.
9. Carvelli V., Fava G., Pisani M. A. (2009) Anchor System for Tension Testing of Large Diameter GFRP Bars. Journal of Composites for Construction, 13 (5), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000027.
10. Castro P. F., Carino N. J. (1998) Tensile and Nondestructive Testing of FRP Bars. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2 (1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(1998)2:1(17).
11. Gizdatullin A. R., Khozin V. G., Kuklin A. N., Khusnutdinov A. M. (2014) Specifics of Testing and Fracture Behavior of Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Bars. Inzhenerno-Stroitelny Zhurnal = Magazine of Civil Engineering, (3), 40–47 (in Russian).
12. Sadin E. Ya. (2016) Anchoring of Fiberglass Reinforcement in Concrete Produced in the Republic of Belarus. Arkhitektura i Stroitelstvo = Architecture and Construction, (3), 68–71 (in Russian).
13. Barsukov V. G., Gnyadek E. G., Nosko A. Yu. (2023) Modernization of Anchor Systems for Tensile Testing of Composite Building Reinforcement. Vesnik Hrodzenskaha Dziarzhaunaha Universiteta Imia Ianki Kupaly. Seryia 6. Tekhnika = Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Series 6. Engineering Science, 13 (2), 62–73 (in Russian).
14. Barsukov V. G., Gnyadek E. G., Nosko A. Yu., Michailau V. (2024) Performance of Modernized Anchor Couplings for Testing Fiberglass Reinforcement. Vesnik Hrodzenskaha Dziarzhaunaha Universiteta Imia Ianki Kupaly. Seryia 6. Tekhnika = Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Series 6. Engineering Science, 14 (1), 26–34 (in Russian).
15. АСI 440.3R-04. Guide Test Methods for Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) for Reinforcing of Strengthening Concrete Structures. Detroit, American Concrete Institute (ACI). 2004. 40.
16. Vinokurov E. F., Balykin M. K., Golubev I. A., Zayats V. N., Makaruk P. N. (1988) Handbook on Strength of Materials. Minsk, Nauka i Tekhnika Publ. 464 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Barsukov V.G., Lezhava A.G., Evseeva E.A. Features of the Stress State of Composite Reinforcement during Tensile Tests. Science & Technique. 2024;23(6):492-499. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2024-23-6-492-499
Views:
284
Email this article 