Changing the Parameters of the Urban Transport System with Introduction of Fees from Car Owners for Using the Road Network and Variations in Public Transport Fare

. The paper discusses issues of urban mobility of the population. In recent decades, Russia and Belarus has seen active urbanization and an increase in the proportion of residents in large cities. This process is accompanied by motorization. The municipal authorities are introducing the concept of priority to public transport, developing metro, trams and bicycle infrastructure. The above studies also note the difficulty of changing people's attitudes towards personal transport and the need to develop public transport. The hypothesis of the impact of measures to stimulate and demotivate the use of personal cars when traveling and the effectiveness of measures, including the organization of paid parking and reduction of parking spaces, is confirmed in the paper. A mathematical model has been developed for the effect of the cost of travel along 1 km of a highway on the number of movements by type of transport and the total travel time. A two-factor mathematical model has been developed for the effect of the cost of travel along 1 km of a highway and the cost of travel in public transport on the share of movements by type of transport and types of movement. The analysis of changes in the structure of population mobility and traffic parameters calculated using the macro model of the city of Tyumen, built in the PTV VISUM program for the morning time of day, is presented. With the introduction of tolls on the city's street and road network with a tariff of 30 rubles per 1 km, the share of movement by passenger cars decreases from 40 to 16 %. Further research is aimed at taking into account the influence of other socio-economic and technological factors on the structure of population mobility, as well as at developing a methodology for determining balanced tariffs for the urban transport system.

1. Diao M. (2019) Towards Sustainable urban Transport in Singapore: Policy Instruments and Mobility Trends. Transport Policy, 2019, 81, 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.005.

2. Errampalli M., Chalumuri R. S., Nath R. (2018) Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Transportation System: A Case Study of Delhi. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Transport, 171 (2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.16.00003.

3. Van Ommeren J. N., Wentink D., Rietveld P. (2012) Empirical Evidence on Cruising for Parking. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46 (1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.011.

4. Willson R. W., Shoup D. C. (1990) Parking Subsidies and Travel Choices: Assessing the Evidence. Transportation, 17, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125333.

5. Cottrill C., Derrible S. (2015) Leveraging Big data for the Development of Transport Sustainability Indicators. Journal of Urban Technology, 22, 45–64. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10630732.2014.942094.

6. Chakrabarti S. (2022) Passively Wait for Gridlock, or Proactively Invest in Service? Strategies to Promote Car-to-Transit Switches Among Aspirational Urbanites in Rapidly Developing Contexts. Transport Policy, 115, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.11.018.

7. Gascon M., Marquet O., Gràcia-Lavedan E., Ambròs A., Götschi T., deNazelle A., Panis L. I., Gerike R., Brand C., Dons E., Eriksson U., Iacorossi F., Ávila-Palència I., Cole-Hunter T., Nieuwenhuisjen M. J. (2020) What Explains Public Transport Use? Evidence from Seven European Cities. Transport Policy, 99, 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.009.

8. Alyavina E., Nikitas A., Tchouamou Njoya E. (2020) Mobility as a Service and Sustainable Travel Behaviour: A Thematic Analysis Study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.004.

9. Keizer M., Sargisson R. J., van Zomeren M., Steg L. (2019) When Personal Norms Predict the Acceptability of Push and Pull Car-Reduction Policies: Testing the ABC Model and Low-Cost Hypothesis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.06.005.

10. Fiedler D., Čertický M., Alonso-Mora J., Čáp M. The Impact of Ridesharing in Mobility-on-Demand Systems: Simulation Case Study in Prague. 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2018 November. IEEE, 1173–1178. https://doi.org/10. 1109/ITSC.2018.8569451.

11. Odeck J., Bråthen S. On Public Attitudes Toward Implementation of Toll Roads – The Case of Oslo Toll Ring. Transport Policy, 4 (2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(97)00008-5.

12. Croci E. (2016) Urban Road Pricing: a Comparative Study on the Experiences of London, Stockholm and Milan. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.062.

13. Zhong S., Wang S., Jiang Y., Yu B., Zhang W. (2015) Distinguishing the Land Use Effects of Road Pricing Based on the Urban form Attributes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.009.

14. Gorev A. E., Bettger K., Prokhorov A. V., Gizatullin R. R. (2015) Transport Modeling Fundamentals. Saint-Petersburg, KOSTA Publ. 168 (in Russian).

15. Kapski D., Kasyanik V., Lobashov O., Kaptsevich O., Galkin A. (2019) Estimating the Parameters of Traffic Flows on the Basis of Processing of Localization Data on the Movement of Vehicles. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Žilina, 21 (2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2019.2.89-99.

16. Zakharov D., Fadyushin A. (2021) The Efficiency of Some Activities for the Development of Urban Infrastructure for Public Transport, Cyclists and Pedestrians. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 204, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.2495/TDI-V5-N2-136-149.