Numerical Modeling and Simulation of Non-Metallic Fiber-Reinforced Concrete: Assessing the Structural Performance with Emphasis on Reeds and Coconut Shells

The optimization of mechanical performance through the use of fiber-reinforced polymer composites is achieved via META simulated experimental design, with a primary emphasis on enhancing the mechanical characteristics. Incorporating reeds and coconut shells, this approach aims for an optimal design that minimizes polymer usage while ensuring specified mechanical performance and economic efficiency. The research, anchored in a probabilistic framework, prioritizes a reliability-based optimization methodology. To assess mechanical performance, nonlinear pushover analyses at the system level  are conducted, with META simulations playing a key role in exploring uncertainties. Within the META framework, inelastic interstory drift ratios are treated as indeterministic variables, while the thickness of the polymer jacket–featuring reeds  and coconut shells–is considered a deterministic design variable. This refined design process not only reduces polymer costs but also systematically evaluates the cost-effectiveness of incorporating reeds and coconut shells, all while adhering to stringent structural reliability constraints. Explicit reliability index constraints, honed through META simulations, ensure the robustness and adaptability of the design optimization process. The numerical optimality criteria method within the META framework provides an efficient solution to the nonlinear retrofit design optimization problem. Illustrating the application,  a design example showcases the seamless integration of reeds and coconut shells, resulting in a significant enhancement  of mechanical performance within the context of retrofitting.

1. Ang A. H., Cornell C. A. (1974) Reliability Bases of Structural Safety and Design. Journal of Structural Engineering, 100 (9), 1755–1769. https://doi.org/10.1061/jsdeag.0003870.

2. Beck J. L., Papadimitrious C., Chan E., Irfanoglu, A. (1998) A Performance-Based Optimal Structural Design Methodology. Report no. EERL 97-30. Pasadena, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.

3. Bertero R. D., Bertero V. V. (2002) Performance-Based Seismic Engineering: the Need for a Reliable Conceptual Comprehensive Approach. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31 (3), 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.146.

4. Cao V. V., Ronagh H. R. (2014) Reducing the Seismic Damage of Reinforced Concrete Frames using FRP Confinement. Composite Structures, 118, 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.038.

5. Chan C. M., Zou X. K. (2004) Elastic and Inelastic Drift Performance Optimization for Reinforced Concrete Building under Earthquake Loads. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33 (8), 929–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.385.

6. Chang C. C., Ger J. F., Cheng F. Y. (1994) Reliability-based Optimum Design for UBC and Nondeterministic Seismic Spectra. Journal of Structural Engineering, 120 (1), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1994)120:1(139).

7. Charney F. A. (2000) Needs in the Development of a Comprehensive Performance Based Design Optimization Process. Advanced Technology in Structural Engineering: Proceedings of Structures Congress 2000, Philadelphia, 8–10 May 2000. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40492(2000)28.

8. Cheng G. D., Li G., Cai Y. (1998) Reli.ability-Based Structural Optimization under Hazard Loads. Structural Optimization, 16, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01202823.

9. Choi S. W. (2017) Investigation on the Seismic Retrofit Positions of FRP Jackets for RC Frames using Multi-Objective Optimization. Composites Part B: Engineering, 123, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.026.

10. Choi S. W., Kim Y., Park H. S. (2014) Multi-Objective Seismic Retrofit Method for using FRP Jackets in Shear-critical Reinforced Concrete Frames. Composites Part B: Engineering, 56, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.049.

11. Computer and Structures, Inc. (CSI) (2000) SAP2000/NL-PUSH Software, Version 7.40. Berkeley, CA: CSI.

12. De Lorenzis L., Tepfers R. (2003) A Comparative Study of Models on Confinement of Concrete Cylinders with FRP Composites. Journal of Composites for Construction, 7 (3), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2003)7:3(219).

13. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2006) Next-Generation Performance-Based Seismic Design Guidelines. Program Plan for New and Existing Buildings. Report no. FEMA 445. Washington, DC. Available at: https://wbdg.org/FFC/DHS/fema445.pdf.

14. Foley C. M. (2002) Optimized Performance-Based Design for Buildings. Burns S. A. (ed.) Recent Advances in Optimal Structural Design. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 169–240.

15. Fragiadakis M., Lagaros N. D., Papadrakakis M. (2006) Performance-Based Multiobjective Optimum Design of Steel Structures Considering Life-Cycle Cost. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 32 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0009-y.

16. Frangopol D. M. (1997) How to Incorporate Reliability in Structural Optimization. Arora J. S. (ed.) Guide to Structural Optimization (ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice no. 90). Reston, VA, American Society of Civil Engineers, 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784402207.ch11.

17. Frangopol D. M., Klisinski M. (1989) Material Behavior and Optimum Design of Structural Systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, 115 (5), 1054–1075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1989)115:5(1054).

18. Frangopol D. M., Moses F. (1994) Reliability-Based Structural Optimization. Adeli H. (ed.) Advances in Design Optimization. London, Chapman & Hall, 492–570.

19. Gao X. W., Bao A. B. (1985) Probabilistic Model and its Statistical Parameters for Seismic Load. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 5 (1), 13–22.

20. Gaxiola-Camacho J. R., Azizsoltani H., Villegas-Mercado F. J., Haldar A. (2017) A Novel Reliability Technique for Implementation of Performance-Based Seismic Design of Structures. Engineering Structures, 142, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.076.

21. GBJ68-84. Unified Standards for the Design of Structures (1984). Available at: https://codeofchina.com/standard/ GBJ68-1984.html. Ghobarah A., El-Attar M., Aly N. M. (2000) Evaluation of Retrofit Strategies for Reinforced Concrete Columns: a Case Study. Engineering Structures, 22 (5), 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(98) 00137-0.

22. Kim S. H., Wen Y. K. (1990) Optimization of Structures under Stochastic loads. Structural Safety, 7 (2–4), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90067-y.

23. Lagaros N. D., Garavelas A. T., Papadrakakis M. (2008) Innovative Seismic Design Optimization with Reliability Constraints. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198 (1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.12.025.

24. Lam L., Teng J. G. (2003) Design-Oriented Stress-Strain Model for FRP-Confined Concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 17 (6-7), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-0618(03)00045-x.

25. Lam L., Teng J. G. (2003) Design-Oriented Stress-Strain Model for FRP-Confined Concrete in Rectangular Columns. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 22 (13), 1149–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684403035429.

26. Li G. (2003) Statistical Properties of the Maximum Elastoplastic Story Drift of Steel Frames. Steel & Composite Structures, 3 (3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2003.3.3.185.

27. Li G., Cheng G. D. (2002) Probability Distribution of Story Drift of Seismic RC frames. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 42 (3), 153–157.

28. Melchers R. E., (1999) Structural Reliability, Analysis and Prediction. 2nd ed. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.

29. Moses F. (1969) Approach to Structural Reliability and Optimization. Cohn M. Z. (ed.) An Introduction to Structural Optimization (Study no. 1). Waterloo, ON, Canada, Solid Mechanics Division, University of Waterloo, 81–120.

30. Shin J., Scott D. W., Stewart L. K., Yang C.-S., Wright T. R., DesRoches R. (2016) Dynamic Response of a Full-Scale Reinforced Concrete Building Frame Retrofitted with FRP Column Jackets. Engineering Structures, 125, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.016.

31. Zou X., Wang Q., Wu J. (2018) Reliability-Based Performance Design Optimization for Seismic Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Advances in Structural Engineering, 21 (6), 838–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217733760.