Road Safety Concept in the Republic of Belarus

The general trend of accident rate reduction, which has been observed in the Republic of Belarus since 2010, reversed in 2017–2018. Remaining within the framework of the country’s traditional engineering activities related to road maintenance is unlikely to  significantly improve road safety. A transition to qualitatively new practices and mechanisms for ensuring road safety is required. In order to implement this transition, a second Road Safety Concept has been developed. The Concept is based on the Safe System approach, which offers the implementation of measures in four areas: improving road infrastructure safety, increasing vehicle safety, ensuring safe speeds, and training safe road users. The main threat to the implementation of the Safe System approach in the Republic of Belarus is the fixation of stakeholders on their narrow corporate interests and the unwillingness to take into account  nation-wide road safety. The Concept mainly focuses on the “Safe Road Infrastructure” component. A transition to sustainable road safety and the introduction of a Forgiving Road approach are included in the Concept. The introduction of assessment of infrastructure projects impact on traffic safety, traffic safety audit and inspections, road traffic risk assessment, and elimination of accident hotspots are also specified. The introduction of road safety audit is considered an important milestone in the transition to the Forgiving Road approach. The development of Intelligent Transportation Systems is included for the same purpose. Despite the fact that the Concept sets reasonably realistic goals, there are certain concerns about the feasibility of their achievement. This is due to significant institutional problems, such as the lack of a single coordinating body and the complexity of interdepartmental interaction.

1. Kapsky D., Bogdanovich S., Volynets A. (2020) Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Concept in Belarus. Varhelyi, A., Žuraulis, V., Prentkovskis, O. (eds). Vision Zero for Sustainable Road Safety in Baltic Sea Region. VISZERO 2018. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham., 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22375-5_13.

2. Johansson R. (2009) Vision Zero – Implementing a Policy for Traffic Safety. Safety Science, 47 (6), 826–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.023.

3. Bliss T., Breen J. (2009) Implementing the Recommendations of the World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention. Country Guidelines for the Conduct of Road Safety Capacity Reviews and the Related Specification of Lead Agency Reforms, Investment Strategies and Safety Projects. Available at: https://www.aprso.org/sites/default/files/document/2020-07/country-guidelines-conduct-road-safety-management.pdf (accessed 04 August 2022).

4. Austroads (2015) Improving the Performance of Safe System Infrastructure. Research Report AP-R498-15. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chris-Jurewicz/publication/295072998_Improving_the_Performance_of_Safe_System_Infrastructure/links/56c6c91208ae8cf828ffba7a/Improving-the-Performance-of-Safe-System-Infrastructure.pdf (accessed 13 March 2018).

5. Turner B. (2013) Implementing the Safe System Approach to Road Safety: Some Examples of Infrastructure Related Approaches. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:760022/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed 04 August 2022).

6. McTiernan D., Turner B., Wernham R., Gregory R. (2010) Local Government and the Safe System Approach to Road Safety. Vermont South: ARRB Group Ltd.

7. Kapskii D. V., Blinkin M. Ya., Tsygankov A. A., Sushko A. A., Bakhanovich, A. G., Kuz'menko V. I., Erchak O. V., Frishchin B. V. (2017) Road Safety: Development Paradigms. Minsk, Kapital Print Publ. 264 (in Russian).

8. Varhelyi A. (2016) Road Safety Management – The Need for a Systematic Approach. The Open Transportation Journal, 10 (1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801610010137.

9. SWOV (October 2007). Background of the five Sustainable Safety Principles. SWOV Fact sheet. Leidschendam, The Netherlands. Available at: https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/20splentyforus/legacy_url/298/FS_Sustainable_Safety_background.pdf?1431368025.

10. Wegman F., Aarts L., Bax Sh. (eds.) (2008) Advancing Sustainable Safety: National Road Safety Outlook for 2005-2020. Safety Science, 46 (2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.013.

11. La Torre F., Saleh P., Cesolini, E., Goyat Y. (2012) Improving Roadside Design to Forgive Human Errors. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 53, 235–244 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.876.

12. Elvik R. (2007) State-of-The-Art Approaches to Road Accident Black Spot Management and Safety Analysis of Road Networks. Report 882/2007. Available at: https://www.toi.no/getfile.php?mmfileid=9022 (accessed 04 August 2022).

13. Geurts K., Wets G. (2003) Black Spot Analysis Methods: Literature Review. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1090.8472&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 04 August 2022).

14. Richards D. C. (2010) Relationship Between Speed and Risk of Fatal Injury: Pedestrians and Car Occupants. Road Safety Web Publication No 16. Department for Transport, London, UK. Available at: https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/relationship_between_speed_risk_fatal_injury_pedestrians_and_car_occupants_richards.pdf (accessed 04 August 2022).

15. Rosen E., Sander U. (2009) Pedestrian Fatality Risk as a Function of Car Impact Speed. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41 (3), 536–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.002.

16. Dingus T. A., Guo F., Lee S., Antin J.F., Perez M., Buchanan-King M., Hankey J. (2016) Driver Crash Risk Factors and Prevalence Evaluation Using Naturalistic Driving data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113 (10), 2636–2641. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.151327111.