Preview

Spectrometer for Estimating SO2 Content in Volcanic Plumes

https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2023-22-5-387-396

Abstract

This work presents the development and implementation of an autonomous portable spectrometer DEVI (Doas Expedition Volcanic Instrument), designed to measure SO2 slant columns in volcanic plumes by remote optical method DOAS (Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) in the range of 290–365 nm with a resolution of at least 1 nm. To achieve this goal, the following tasks have been solved: practical implementation of the spectrometer, including design of optical scheme; design of a spectrometer housing for reducing scattered radiation and facilitate adjustments; applying of additional sensors to record measurement conditions; laboratory measurements to determine the spectrometer's characteristics; field measurements and preliminary data processing to retrieve SO2 slant columns in volcanic plumes. During the spectrometer design phase, numerical simulation methods in the Zemax software have been used, while DOAS was applied for processing experimental data for retrieving SO2 slant columns. Our laboratory measurements showed that the DEVI spectrometer has a spectral resolution of 0.58 ± 0.5 nm and an angular field of view of 1 × 0.25°. To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, mathematical filter based on the experimentally determined noise parameters of the DEVI detector has been introduced, which allowed us to estimate the SO2 slant columns in volcanic plumes. DEVI was successfully tested during expeditions to the Kuril Islands in the periods of July – August, 2021 and 2022 (31.07–13.08.2021 and 27.07–29.08.2022). Our field measurements and data processing showed the SO2 slant column value of (7.5 ± 1.2)·1017 molecules/cm2 for the volcano Chirinkotan. Obtained estimation is consistent with known results obtained for other volcanoes.

About the Authors

I. I. Bruchkouski
A. N. Sevchenko Institute of Applied Physical Problems of Belarusian State University, National Research Center for Ozonosphere Monitoring of Belarusian State University
Belarus

Minsk, Republic of Belarus



H. S. Litvinovich
A. N. Sevchenko Institute of Applied Physical Problems of Belarusian State University
Belarus

Minsk, Republic of Belarus



References

1. Sparks R. S. J. (2003) Forecasting Volcanic Eruptions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 210 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00124-9.

2. Poland M. P., Lopez T., Wright R., Pavolonis M. J. (2020) Forecasting, Detecting, and Tracking Volcanic Eruptions from Space. Remote Sensing in Earth Systems Sciences, 3 (1), 55–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41976-020-00034-x.

3. Aiuppa A., Moretti R., Federico C., Giudice G., Gur-rieri S., Liuzzo M., Papale P., Shinohara H., Valenza M. (2007) Forecasting Etna Eruptions by Real-Time Obser-vation of Volcanic Gas Composition. Geology, 35 (12), 1115–1118. https://doi.org/10.1130/g24149a.1.

4. Platt U., Stutz J. (2008) Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2008. 597.

5. Warnach S., Bobrowski N., Hidalgo S., Arellano S., Sihler H., Dinger F., Lübcke P., Battaglia J., Steele A., Galle B., Platt U., Wagner T. (2019) Variation of the BrO/SO2 Molar Ratio in the Plume of Tungurahua Volcano Between 2007 and 2017 and Its Relationship to Volcanic Activity. Frontiers in Earth Science, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00132.

6. Bobrowski N., Hönninger G., Galle B., Platt U. (2003) Detection of Bromine Monoxide in a Volcanic Plume. Nature, 423 (6937), 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01625.

7. Toshiba TCD1304DG. Available at: https://toshiba.semicon-storage.com/ap-en/semiconductor/product/linear-image-sensors/detail.TCD1304DG.html (accessed 23 July 2020).

8. Zemax Official Website. Available at: https://www.zemax.com (accessed 21 August 2022).

9. Irie K., McKinnon A. E., Unsworth K., Woodhead I. M. (2008) A Technique for Evaluation of CCD Video-Came-ra Noise. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 18 (2), 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsvt.2007.913972.

10. QDOAS Software. Available at: https://uv-vis.aeronomie.be/software/QDOAS/ (accessed 04 April 2023).

11. Litvinovich H. S., Bruchkouski I. I. (2021) Algorithm for Preliminary Processing of Charge Coupled Devices Array Data Based on the Adaptive Wiener filter. Informatika = Informatics, 18 (1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.37661/1816-0301-2021-18-1-72-83 (in Russian).

12. Lübcke P., Bobrowski N., Arellano S., Galle B., Gar-zón G., Vogel L., Platt U. (2014) BrO/SO2 Molar Ratios From Scanning DOAS Measurements in the NOVAC Network. Solid Earth, 5 (1), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-409-2014.


Review

For citations:


Bruchkouski I.I., Litvinovich H.S. Spectrometer for Estimating SO2 Content in Volcanic Plumes. Science & Technique. 2023;22(5):387-396. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2023-22-5-387-396

Views: 314


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-1031 (Print)
ISSN 2414-0392 (Online)