Preview

Optimization of Main Canal Parameters in the Area of Hydraulically Most Advantageous Sections

https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2023-22-3-208-215

Abstract

The main canals of reclamation systems, along with the best economic performance, must also meet the requirements for connecting the conductive network in the vertical plane and the technology for the construction of the channel. 

Although the channels of the hydraulically most advantageous profile are the most economical un terms of excavation volume, often turn out to be too deep and of small width along the bottom, which does not meet the specified requirements.  All these factors can be taken into account by slightly reducing the water flow velocity u (compared to the velocity in the channel with the most hydraulically advantageous cross section uh.a.), which leads to a significant decrease in the channel depth and, accordingly, an increase in the width of the channel along the bottom.  Such a decrease in velocity is economically justified (without a significant increase in the cross-sectional area) in the region of the most hydraulically advantageous sections, where the curve of the function h = f(u) sharply increases and asymptotically approaches the ordinate with the maximum possible velocity uh.a. This area can be approximately characterized by the values of the velocity u = (0.95–1.0)uh.a. For the convenience of calculation, the formula obtained earlier by the author for the channel depth of the hydraulically most advantageous profile has been converted to a simpler form. An analytical method is proposed for calculating the optimal parameters of the channel section, located in the area of the most hydraulically advantageous sections, which is characterized by the optimization coefficient Kopt = u/uh.a, varying within Kopt. = 0.95–1.0. In this area, the cross section of the channel differs slightly from  the most hydraulically advantageous profile, and, at the same time, satisfies the requirements for conjugation of the conductive network in the vertical plane and the conditions of work. The proposed calculation method is less laborious and is applicable in a wide range of changes pertaining to exponent y in the formula of N. N. Pavlovsky to determine the Chezy’s coefficient. The calculation according to the proposed method is performed based on the use of dependencies to determine the characteristics of the most hydraulically advantageous section and the formulas of channel hydraulics (with a slight gradual decrease in the water flow rate u). Formulas are obtained for determining the depth and width of the channel along the bottom at various values of velocity.

About the Authors

E. I. Mikhnevich
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus

Address for correspondence:
Mikhnevich Eduard I. –
Belarusian National Technical University,
9, B. Hmelnitzkogo str.,
220013, Minsk, Republic of Belarus
Tel.: +375 17 293-92-10
fes@bntu.by



Zeming Li
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus

Minsk



References

1. ТКP [Technical Code of Common Practice] 45-3.04-8–2005 (02250) Ameliorative Systems and Structures. Design Standards. Minsk, 2006, 106 (in Russian).

2. Mikhnevich E. I., Li Zé Ming (2022) Capacity of the Main Canal That Supplies Water from Huág hé River to Hetao Irrigation Systemо. Tridtsat' Sed'moe Plenarnoe Mezhvuzovskoe Koordina-Tsionnoe Soveshchanie po Probleme Erozionnykh, Ruslovykh i Ust'evykh Protsessov (g. Ryazan', 3–7 Oktyabrya 2022 g.): Doklady i Soobshcheniya [37th Plenary Interuniversity Coordination Meeting on the Problem of Erosion, Channel and Estuary Processes (Ryazan, October 3 – 7, 2022): Reports and Messages]. Moscow, Moscow State University, 128–130 (in Russian).

3. Agroskin I. I., Dmitriev I. I., Pikalov F. I. (1964) Hydraulics. 4th ed. Moscow – Leningrad, Energiya Publ, 352 (in Russian).

4. Shterenlikht D. V. (2007) Hydraulics. Moscow, Kolos S Publ, 655 (in Russian).

5. Mikhnevich E. I. (2021) Open Watercourses: Carrying Capacity and Sustainability. Minsk, Belarusian National Technical University, 311 (in Russian).

6. Mikhnevich E. I. (2020) Calculation of Throughput and Stability of Channels. Ekologiya i Stroitelstvo, (1), 23–31 (in Russian).

7. Spitsin I. P., Sokolova V. A. (1990) General and River Hydraulics. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat Publ, 360 (in Russian).

8. Uginchus A. A. (1965) Hydraulic and Technical and Economic Calculations of Channels. Moscow, Publishing House of Literature on Construction, 274 (in Russian).

9. Mikhalyov M. A. (2013) Calculation of Main Channels. Inzhenerno-Stroitelny Zhurnal = Magazine of Civil Engineering, (4), 83–93 (in Russian).

10. Gulkov N. F. (1991) Calculation of the Most Economically Advantageous Living Section of a Trapezoidal Channel. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya po Melioratsii i Vodnomu Khozyaistvu [Scientific and Technical Institute of Land Reclamation and Water Management]. Minsk, Ministry of Water Resources of Belarussian Soviet Socialist Republic, (5), 21–27 (in Russian).

11. Mikhnevich E. I. Levkevich V. E. (2022) Stability of Channels and Regulation of the Flow of Navigable Rivers and Canals. Minsk, Pravo i Ekonomika Publ, 188 (in Russian).

12. Gladkov G. L., Chalov R. S., Berkovich K. M. (2019) Hydromorphology of the Chan of Navigable Rivers. 2nd ed. Saint-Peterburg, Lan Publ, 432 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Mikhnevich E.I., Li Z. Optimization of Main Canal Parameters in the Area of Hydraulically Most Advantageous Sections. Science & Technique. 2023;22(3):208-215. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2023-22-3-208-215

Views: 381


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-1031 (Print)
ISSN 2414-0392 (Online)