Theoretical and Methodological Substantiation of the Assessment and Development of Logistics Infrastructure
https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2023-23-1-69-78
Abstract
The paper presents the research results in the field of theoretical and methodological substantiation of the assessment and development of a logistics infrastructure that can operate at various levels, including regional and national. The analysis carried out has made it possible to divide all assessment methods into two groups: those based on expert assessments and those based on quantitative data. As expert methods for assessing the logistics infrastructure, such international approaches were studied as LPI index (Logistics Performance Index); global competitiveness index; TTCI index (Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index), where “Infrastructure” subindex includes indicators related to both the main component of the logistics infrastructure (related to the activities of air and rail transport, as well as the quality of air and ground infrastructure), and to the supporting one (number of hotel rooms, car rental companies, ATMs), as well as the annual rating of World competitiveness of the countries of the world (IMD World Competitiveness Ranking); index of involvement of countries in international trade (ETI); methodology for assessing the quality of transport infrastructure, developed by the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation within the framework of the program “Development of the transport system”. Studies have shown that there are few works using quantitative methods for assessing the logistics infrastructure, for example: a method for a comprehensive assessment of the transport infrastructure of a region by A. M. Kudryavtsev and L. N. Rudneva, Yu. V. Kataev’s method for a multi-level assessment of the development of transport infrastructure, methodology for assessing the attractiveness of the region’s logistics infrastructure for accommodating key objects of the warehouse and transport network developed by A. N. Rakhmangulov and O. A. Kopylova, researches of F. Carlucci. While preparing plans for the development of logistics infrastructure, it is proposed to use existing approaches, combining expert and quantitative assessment methods.
About the Authors
R. B. IvutBelarus
Address for correspondence:
Ivut Roman B. –
Belаrusian National Technical University
12, Ya. Kolasa str.,
220013, Minsk, Republic of Belarus
Tel.: +375 17 292-75-31
eut_atf@bntu.by
P. V. Popov
Russian Federation
Volgograd
P. I. Lapkovskaya
Belarus
Minsk
S. V. Prokopov
Russian Federation
Volgograd
References
1. Arvis J. F., Ojala L., Wiederer C., Shepherd B., Raj A., Dairabayeva K., Kiiski T. (2018) Connecting to Compete 2018: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. Open Knowledge Repository. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29971 (accessed 4 May 2022).
2. The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2018.pdf (accessed 4 May 2022).
3. The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2019. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TTCR_2019.pdf (accessed 4 May 2022).
4. World Competitiveness Yearbook. Available at: https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-competitiveness/ (accessed 4 May 2022).
5. The Global Enabling Trade Report 2016. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GETR_2016_report.pdf (accessed 4 May 2022).
6. On Approval of the Methodology for Calculating Indicators of the State Program of the Russian Federation “Development of the Transport System”, the Transport Part of the Comprehensive Modernization Plan and Expansion of the Main Infrastructure for the Period up to 2024 and Federal Projects Included in its Composition: Order of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation, dated 30.04.2019, No 129. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/metod/naz-proekt/MET130000.pdf (accessed 4 May 2022) (in Russian).
7. Kudryavtsev A. M., Rudneva L. N. (2014) Methodology for a Comprehensive Assessment оf the Functioning Efficiency
8. of the Regional Transport Infrastructure. Rossiiskoe Predprinimatelstvo [Russian Entrepreneurship], (8), 109–121 (in Russian).
9. Kataeva Yu. V. (2013) Integral Assessment of the Level of the Regional Transport Infrastructure Development. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Ekonomika = Perm University Herald. Economy, (4), 66–73 (in Russian).
10. Rakhmangulov A. N., Kopylova O. A. (2014) Assessment of the Socio-Economic Potential of the Region for the Placement of Logistics Infrastructure Facilities. Ekonomika Regiona = Economy of the Regions, (2), 254–263 (in Russian).
11. Carlucci F., Cirà A., Forte E., Siviero L. (2017) Infrastructure and Logistics Divide: Regional Comparisons between North Eastern & Southern Italy. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23 (2), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1070768.
12. Zhou L., Chen Y., Jing Y., Jiang Y. (2021) Evolutionary Game Analysis on Last Mile Delivery Resource Integration – Exploring the Behavioral Strategies between Logistics Service Providers, Property Service Companies and Customers. Sustainability, 13, 12240. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112240.
13. Mukhtarova K. S., Ospanov S. S., Antoni A., Sharapiyeva M. D. (2018) The Evaluation of the Efficiency of Transport and Logistics Infrastructure of Railway Transport. Pomorstvo, 32 (1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.31217/p.32.1.3.
Review
For citations:
Ivut R.B., Popov P.V., Lapkovskaya P.I., Prokopov S.V. Theoretical and Methodological Substantiation of the Assessment and Development of Logistics Infrastructure. Science & Technique. 2023;22(1):69-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2023-23-1-69-78