Preview

Science & Technique

Advanced search

The Comparative Study of the Development on Prefabricated Construction

https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2022-21-5-397-409

Abstract

Prefabricated construction is one of the most intensively developing areas of research in the field of construction and building technology in the world. The results of the scientometric analysis prefabricated construction are presents in this paper. The purpose of the scientometric analysis was to study the directions and effectiveness of research, to determine the leading countries, organizations, scientific journals, to define the level of prefabricated construction in the Republic of Belarus in the context of economically developed countries. The scientometric analysis was carried out in the analytical system SciVal with the use visualization tools, quantitative and qualitative scientometric metrics. Growth of the number of publications in the field of prefabricated construction and indicators of analyzed scientometrics metrics confirms the fact that prefabricated construction attracts more and more researchers all over the world and is a promising direction of scientific research. Determined that design and informational modeling, organization of construction and precast structures production, delivery of structures to the construction site and their assembly, including reliability, efficiency, environmental friendliness of prefabricated construction are main topics in the field of prefabricated construction. At the same time, topics in the field of research of technologies and organization production of reinforced concrete elements in plant, production management are given less attention, which requires further research in these areas. The results of the scientometric analysis allow us to identify trends, determine priority areas for further research and their connection with other fields of science, and can be a scientific basis for identifying data gaps in current research in the field of prefabricated construction.

About the Author

V. Yu. Gurinovich
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus

Address for correspondence
Gurinovich Vitaliy Yu. –
Bel
аrusian National Technical University,
65 Nezavisimosty Ave., 
220013 , Minsk, Republic of Belarus. 
Tel.: +375 17 292-74-12 
Gurinovich@bntu.by



References

1. Pilipenko V. M., Potershchuk V. A., Petsold T. M. (2015) Prospects for development of industrial housing construction in the Republic of Bealrus. Sovremennye problemy vnedreniya evropeiskikh stan-dartov v oblasti stroitel'stva: sb. Mezhdunar. nauch.-tekhn. st. [Modern problems of implementation of European standards in the field of construction: Collection of International Scientific and Technical Papers]. Minsk, Belarusian National Technical University, 8–14 (in Russian).

2. Government Program “Housing Construction” for 2016–2020: approved by the resolution of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus on 21.04.2016 No. 325. Pravo.by. Available at: https://pravo.by/document/?guid=12551&p0=C21600325&p1=1 (in Russian).

3. Azman, M. N. A., Ahamad M. S. S., Wan Hussin W. M. A. (2012) Comparative Study on Prefabrication Construction Process. International Surveying Research Journal, 2 (1), 45–58.

4. Polat G. (2010) Precast Concrete Systems in Developing Vs. Industrialized Countries. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16 (1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.08.

5. Efimenko A. Z. (2012) Development and identification of power reserves of construction industry enterprises. Moscow, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering. 198 (in Russian).

6. Wenhui Liu, Hong Zhang, Qian Wang, Tianran Hua, Hong Xue (2021) A Review and Scientometric Analysis of Global Research on Prefabricated Buildings. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8869315

7. Hosseini M. R., Martek I., Zavadskas E. K., Aibinu A. A., Arashpour M., Chileshe N. (2018) Critical Evaluation of Off-Site Construction Research: a Scientometric Analysis. Automation in Construction, 87, 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002

8. Akoev M., Markusova V., Moskaleva O., Pislyakov V. (2014) Handbook for Scientometrics: Indicators of science and technology development. Ekaterinburg, Publishing House of the Ural University. 250 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15826/b978-5-7996-1352-5.0000

9. Alinaitwe H. M., Mwakali J. A., Hansson B. (2006) Assessing the Degree of Industrialization in Construction – a Case of Uganda. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 12 (3),. 221–229. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2006.9636396

10. Vogler А. (2015) The House as a Product. Amsterdam, IOS Press. 198.

11. Cao X., Li X., Zhu Y., Zhang Z. (2015) A Comparative Study of Environmental Performance between Prefabricated and Traditional Residential Buildings in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.120.

12. Hamill P., Bertolini M., Biebighauser M., Bechara C. H., Wilden H. (2006) Precast Concrete Value Engineering Accommodates Difficult Sites. PCI Journal, 51 (4), 2–25. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07012006.18.40

13. Manrique J. D., Al-Hussein M., Telyas A., Funston G. (2007) Case Study-Based Challenges of Quality Concrete Finishing for Architecturally Complex Structures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133 (3), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:3(208)

14. Tam V. W., Tam C. M., Zeng S. X., Ng W. C. (2007) Towards Adoption of Prefabrication in Construction. Building and Environment, 42 (10), 3642–3654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.003.

15. VanGeem M. (2006) Achieving Sustainability with Precast Concrete. PCI Journal, 51 (1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01012006.42.61

16. Chippagiri R., Gavali H. R., Ralegaonkar R. V., Riley M., Shaw A., Bras A. (2021). Application of Sustainable Prefabricated Wall Technology for Energy Efficient Social Housing. Sustainability, 13 (3), 1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031195

17. Jaillon L., Poon C. S. (2008) Sustainable Construction Aspects of Using Prefabrication in Dense Urban Environment: а Hong Kong Case Study. Construction Management and Economics, 26 (3), 953–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802259043

18. Hong J., Shen G. Q., Li Z., Zhang B., Zhang W. (2018) Barriers to Promoting Prefabricated Construction in China: а Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.171

19. Mao C., Xie F., Hou L., Wu P., Wang J., Wang X. (2016) Cost Analysis for Sustainable Off-Site Construction Based on a Multiple-Case Study in China. Habitat International, 57, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.08.002

20. Pan W., Sidwell R. (2011) Demystifying the Cost Barriers to Offsite Construction in the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 29 (11), 1081–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.637938

21. Li Z., Shen G. Q., Xue X. (2014) Critical Review of the Research on the Management of Prefabricated Construction. Habitat International, 43, 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.001

22. Tam V. W., Fung I. W., Sing M. C., Ogunlana S. O. (2015) Best Practice of Prefabrication Implementation in the Hong Kong Public and Private Sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.045

23. Nadim W., Goulding J. S. (2010) Offsite Production in the UK: the Way Forward? A UK Construction Industry Perspective. Construction Innovation, 10 (2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171011037183

24. Zhai X., Reed R., Mills A. (2014) Factors Impeding the Offsite Production of Housing Construction in China: an Investigation of Current Practice. Construction Management and Economics, 32 (1–2), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.787491

25. Korshunova A. P., Mushtaeva N. E., Nikolaev V. A., Senatorov N. Ya., Strunkin N. P., Fomin G. N. (2007) Technology of construction production and labor protection. Moscow, Arkhitektura-S Publ. 375 (in Russian).

26. Chang Y., Li X., Masanet E., Zhang L., Huang Z., Ries R. (2018) Unlocking the Green Opportunity for Prefabricated Buildings and Construction in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.025

27. Wang Z., Hu H., Gong J., Ma X., Xiong W. (2019) Precast Supply Chain Management in Off-Site Construction: a Critical Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 1204–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.229

28. Matthew Goh, Yang Miang, Goh Lean (2019) Production Theory-Based Simulation of Modular Construction Processes. Automation in Construction, 101, 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.017

29. Liew J., Richard Y. (2018) Innovation in Modular Building Construction. 9th International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures (ICASS 2018), Hong Kong, 5–7 Decem. 2018, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18057/ICASS2018.K.05

30. Grosskopf K. R., Elliott J. W., Killingsworth J. E. (2016) Offsite Construction – U.S. Market Trends in Prefabrication Challenges for Technology Innovation: аn Agenda for the Future. International Conference on Sustainable Smart Manufacturing (S2M), Lisbon, 20–22 Oct. 2016, 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315198101-69


Review

For citations:


Gurinovich V.Yu. The Comparative Study of the Development on Prefabricated Construction. Science & Technique. 2022;21(5):397-409. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2022-21-5-397-409

Views: 13197


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-1031 (Print)
ISSN 2414-0392 (Online)