Choosing Method for Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis for Energy Enterprises

The reform of the energy sector in the Republic of Belarus, which in the last few years has moved to the stage of active implementation, will bring significant changes in the management of energy enterprises. The introduction of risk management for energy enterprises will become a necessary stage, which is justified by the transition of the energy sector to market relations. In this regard, it is necessary to consider the main issues of risk assessment for energy enterprises. The paper proposes a method for qualitative and quantitative analysis of all the risks that an energy enterprise may face in the process of energy generation. The approaches of various authors to the algorithm of qualitative risk analysis have been considered in the paper. This has made it possible to clarify the main tasks that need to be solved when conducting a qualitative risk analysis. The paper also presents an analysis of methods for quantitative risk analysis. The most commonly used methods include scenario analysis and mathematical statistics, analogy and analytical methods, methods for assessing losses, expert assessments and the theory of statistical games. Each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages. The performed analysis of quantitative risks has permitted to substantiate the choice of methods applicable to the energy sector, taking into account the specificity of activity type. The paper has studied various scales for estimating the probability and possible losses from risks. A comparative analysis of these scales is presented and the choice of a scale for energy enterprises is justified in the paper. Attention has been paid to the problem of probability classification pertaining to occurrence of risk events. The methodology for determining the value of possible losses when performing  a risk event has been considered in detail. Potential losses are classified into the following groups: interruptions in the technological process, consequences for people, environmental consequences. Possible financial losses, as well as losses from the position of the law and reputation, have been considered separately. A critical review of risk management methods has been performed in the paper. The paper has identified the most promising methods of risk management for energy enterprises

energy, specificity of activity, risks, management, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, probability, magnitude of consequences, risk management methodology

1. . Dogil L. F. (2014) Risk management and insurance in business. Minsk, Misanta Publ. 321 (in Russian).

2. Algin A. (1989) Risk and its role in public life. Moscow, Mysl Publ. 160 (in Russian).

3. Balabanov I. T. (1996) Risk management. Moscow, Finan-sy i Statistika Publ. 192 (in Russian).

4. Lapusta M. G., Sharshukova L. G.. (1998) Risks in entrepreneurial activity. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ. 224 (in Russian),

5. Knight F. H. (2003) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Moscow, Delo P. 218 (in Russian).

6. Rymkevich V. V. (2001) Economic theory of risks. Minsk, Belarus State Economic University. 208 (in Russian).

7. Tsai T. N., Grabovyi P. G., Marashda Bassam Sayel (1999) Competition and Risk Management at Enterprises in Market Conditions. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ. 286 (in Russian).

8. Lyubimova N. G., Petrovskii E. S. (2014) Economics and management in energy. Moscow, Yurayt Publ. 485 (in Russian).

9. Tymul E. I. (2019) Risks of energy enterprises: technological and economic aspects. Ekonomika. Uprav-lenie. Innovatsii = Economics. Management. Innovations, 5 (1), 26–30 (in Russian).

10. Buyanov V. P., Kirsanov K. A., Mikhailov L. A. (2002) Riskology: risk management. Moscow, Ekzamen Publ. 382 (in Russian).

11. Golovacheva I. V., Lizunova T. P. (1993) Assessment of economic risk. Minsk, Academy of Public Administration under the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus. 22 (in Russian).

12. Granaturov V. M. (1999) Economic risk: essence, methods of measurement, ways of reduction. Moscow, Delo i Servis Publ. 112 (in Russian).

13. Stoyanova E. S. [ed.] (1993) Financial management. Mos-cow, Perspektiva Publ. 768 (in Russian).

14. Khokhlov N. V. (1999) Risk management. Moscow, UNITY Publ. 239 (in Russian).

15. Yukaeva V. S. (1999) Management decisions. Moscow, Dashkov i K Publ. 292 (in Russian).

16. Panyukov D. I., Panyukova E. V. (2015) Preliminary study of the object of analysis in the framework of the FMEA method. Innovatsionnaya Nauka [Innovative science], (11), 103–108 (in Russian).