Ways to Improve Road Safety Audit in the Republic of Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2021-20-1-45-51
Abstract
There are two types of internationally recognized engineering approaches to addressing road safety issues – proactive and reactive. Predicted or proactive approach includes prevention of accidents and taking corrective measures before accidents can occur. One example of this approach is road safety audit, which is a relatively new tool in developing countries. The paper has analyzed approaches to road safety audit outlined in guidelines of the United Kingdom, Ireland, USA, Australia, Canada, as well as in guidelines of Asian Development Bank for the countries of Central Asian Regional Economic Cooperation. All reviewed documents are characterized by a similar approach to the basic definitions, to selection of audit team and requirements for team members, to the main stages of road safety audit. All reviewed guidelines emphasize that audit is not a means of project works evaluation, verification of compliance with standards, a means of projects ranking or evaluation. Approach to road safety audit, outlined in recommendations developed in the Republic of Kazakhstan has also been analyzed. It has been established that the document does not meet approaches adopted in developed countries. Conditions of the Republic of Kazakhstan require development of a new document based on analysis of the best international experience. Currently, the Republic of Kazakhstan has embarked on a gradual introduction of “road forgiving mistakes” approach to the design and operation of roads. This fact should also be considered when revising road safety audit manual.
About the Authors
K. IbrayevKazakhstan
Address for correspondence: Ibrayev Kenzat – GOLD PRODUCTS LLP, 30/224, Turkistan str., 010000, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan. Tel.: +7 701 614-42-40 goldproducts.kz@gmail.com
D. Kapskiy
Belarus
Minsk
S. Bogdanovic
Belarus
Minsk
References
1. Jacobs G., Aeron-Thomas A., Astrop A. (2000) Estimating Global Road Fatalities. Crowthorne, Transport Research Laboratory, TRL Report, No 445.
2. World Health Organization and the World Bank (2004) World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention. Geneva.
3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2010) Highway Safety Manual. 1st ed. Washington, DC.
4. Roads and Highways Department (RHD), Ministry of Communication, Bangladesh (May 2005) Guidelines for Road Safety Audit. Dhaka.
5. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Road Safety Audits: an Emerging and Effective Tool for Improved Safety. Available at: www.ite.org/technical/ Inter-sectionSafety/RSA.pdf. (accessed 3 July 2013).
6. Transportation Research Board (2003) National Cooperative Highway Research Program. NCHRP Synthesis 321. Road Safety Tools for Local Agencies: a Synthesis of Highway Practice. Washington, DC.
7. European Directive on Road Safety Management [2008/96/EC]. Guidelines for Competent Authorities on the Application of the Directive. London: Department for Transport, 2011. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/3565/guidelines.pdf. (accessed 06 Au-gust 2018).
8. Kapskii D. V., Bogdanovich S. V. (2018) Ways and means for road infrastructore safety improvement in several codntries of the customs union. Avtomobil'nye dorogi i mosty = Roads and Bridges, (2), 95–102 (in Russian).
9. R RK 218-142–2017 Recommendations on the Audit and Inspection of Road Safety on Public Roads. Available at: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=39278623#pos=0;0 (in Russian).
10. ODM 218.6.027–2017 Recommendations for Road Safety Audit in Design, Construction and Operation of Roads. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/456090610 (in Russian).
11. TKP 590–2016 Roads. Requirements for Inspection of Road Safety System. Available at: https://rovar.info/tkp-590-2016-avtomobilnye-dorogi-trebovanija-k-obsledovaniju-sistemy-obespechenija-bdd/
12. Institution of Highways and Transportation (November, 2017) HD 19/15 Guidelines for Road Safety Audit.
13. Transport Infrastructure Ireland (2017) Standard NRA HA 19 Road Safety Audit Guidelines. Dublin.
14. US Department of Transportation (2006) FHWA Road Safety Audit Guidelines. Washington, DC.
15. Guide to Road Safety. Part 6: Road Safety Audit. No AGRS06-09. Austroads Publication, 2009.
16. Ho G., Zein S., de Leur P. (2001) The Canadian Road Safety Audit Guide. Ottawa, Transportation Association of Canada. 81.
17. CAREC Road Safety Engineering Manual 1: Road Safety Audit. Asian Development Bank, 2018. http://doi.org/10.22617/TIM179172-2
18. NZ Transport Agency (2013) Road Safety Audit Procedures for Projects. Wellington. Available at: https://nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/road-safety-audit-procedures/docs/road-safety-audit-procedures-tfm9.pdf
Review
For citations:
Ibrayev K., Kapskiy D., Bogdanovic S. Ways to Improve Road Safety Audit in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Science & Technique. 2021;20(1):45-51. https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2021-20-1-45-51