Optimized Data Exchange Process between Design and Production Engineering

Growing vehicle variant diversity, legal requirements to reduce fleet CO₂ emissions and innovations in the area of drive train technologies, coupled with the increasing pressure to cut costs, pose new challenges for parties in the automotive sector. An implementation of optimized development and production processes supports the effective handling of these challenges. One important aspect includes engineering efficiency improvement by optimizing the entire automotive bodywork development process and the involved data management. Research activities focus on the data exchange processes between design, simulation and production engineering within various CAx environments. This concerns constantly changing boundary conditions and requirements in the area of automotive body development, including but not limited to the introduction of new materials and material combinations and new types of joining technologies. From the viewpoint of an automotive engineering supplier, additional challenges caused by different customer-related development environments have to be considered. To overcome these challenges, various data exchange strategies between OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturer), automotive suppliers and the use of different data management tools need to be investigated. In this context, the paper presents an approach of an optimized data exchange process of CAD-based data between different CAD (Computer-Aided Design) and CAM (Computer-Aided Manufacturing) environments that supports the entire body development, including data provision for manufacturing engineering. In addition, an optimization of data exchange processes saves development costs and improves the product quality.

1. Niikura A. (2018) The impact of the application of aluminum. ATZ Extra Issue Motor Fan Special Edition illustrated, (Aluminum Technology 4).

2. Hirz M., Rossbacher P. (2016) Enhanced Knowledge-based 3D-CAD methods supporting automotive Body-in-white production engineering. MOTSP2016 International Conference Management of Technology – Step to Sustainable Production. Porec, Croatia.

3. Autoevolution, homepage of Autoevolution. Available at: https://www.autoevolution.com/news/audi-a8-the-car-body-of-the-year-26659.html (accessed 23 August 2019).

4. Pahl G., Beitz W., Feldhusen J., Grote K. H. (2007) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer, Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2

5. Weber J. (2009) Automotive Development Processes Processes for Successful Customer Oriented Vehicle Development. Springer, Munich, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01253-2

6. Malen D. E. (2011) Fundamentals of Automobile Body Structure Design. SAE, Warrendale, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.4271/r-394

7. Kreis A., Hirz M., Stadler, S., Salchner M., Rossbacher P. (2018) Convenient connection technology data model supporting optimized information exchange between CAx-Systems. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 15 (5), 771-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2018.1441244

8. Thum K., Hirz M., Mayr J. (2014) An integrated approach supporting design, simulation, and production engineering of connection techniques in automotive body-in-white development. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 11 (4), 411-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2014.881183

9. Nedic S., D’Elia, A., Palmquist N. (2016) The all-new Volvo V90 car body. EuroCarBody2016. Bad Nauheim, Germany.

10. Robert H., Scherrer J. M. (2016) New Peugeot 3008. EuroCarBody2016. Bad Nauheim, Germany.

11. Pugh-Jones Y., Richardson P., Walker F. (2016) Aston Martin DB11. EuroCarBody2016. Bad Nauheim, Germany.

12. Hachino M. (2018) Evolving Joining Technologies for Aluminum. ATZ Extra Issue Motor Fan Special Edition illustrated, (Alumium Technology 4).

13. Hirz M., Dietrich W., Gfrerrer A., Lang J. (2013) Integrated Computer-Aided Design in Automotive Development. Springer, Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11940-8

14. Kovacs G. L., Kochan D. (2013) Digital Product and Process Development Systems. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer, Dresden, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41329-2

15. Dassault Systemes CATIA. Available at: https://www.3ds.com/de/produkte-und-services/catia/ ( accessed 23 August 2019).

16. Siemens NX. Available at: https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/global/de/products/nx/ (accessed 23 August 2019).

17. Norm ISO 8879. Information processing – Text and office systems – Standard generalized markup language, 1986.

18. Norm ISO 14306. Industrial automation systems and integration – JT file format specification for 3D visualization, 2017.

19. Norm ISO 10303. Industrial automation systems and integration – Product data representation and exchange, 2014.

20. Hirz M., Rossbacher P., Gavačová J. (2016) Future trends in CAD – from the perspective of Automotive Industry. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 14 (6), 734-741. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2017.1287675