Validation of an Assistance System for Merging Maneuvers in Highways in Real Driving Conditions

In the latest study conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in 2018, it was published that human error is still considered the major factor in traffic accidents, 94 %, compared with other causes such as vehicles, environment and unknown critical reasons. Some driving scenarios are especially complex, such as highways merging lanes, where the driver obtains information from the environment while making decisions on how to proceed to perform the maneuver smoothly and safely. Ignorance of the intentions of the drivers around him leads to risky situations between them caused by misunderstandings or erroneous assumptions or perceptions. For this reason, Advanced Driver Assistance Systems could provide information to obtain safer maneuvers in these critical environments. In previous works, the behavior of the driver by means of a visual tracking system while merging in a highway was studied, observing a cognitive load in those instants due to the high attentional load that the maneuver requires. For this reason, a driver assistance system for merging situations is proposed. This system uses V2V communications technology and suggests to the driver how to modify his speed in order to perform the merging manoeuver in a safe way considering the available gap and the relative speeds between vehicles. The paper presents the results of the validation of this system for assisting in the merging maneuver. For this purpose, the interface previously designed and validated in terms of usability, has been integrated into an application for a mobile device, located inside the vehicle and tests has been carried out in real driving conditions.

1. World Health Organization (2018) Global status report on road safety 2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2018/en/

2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. U.S. Department of Transportation (2018) Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. Report DOT HS 812 506. Available at: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/api/public/viewpublication/812115

3. Sanchez-Mateo S, Clavijo M., Díaz-Álvarez A., Jimenez F. (2018) Interface design for an assistance system focused on high attentional load situations. 25th ITS World Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark. Paper EU‐TP1639

4. Sanchez-Mateo S., Perez-Moreno E., Jiménez F., Naranjo J.E., Perez Flores C., Antoñazas Teruel J. (2018). Study of a driver assistance interface for merging situations on highways. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES), Madrid, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1109/icves.2018.8519495

5. Jula H., Kosmatopoulos E. B., Ioannou P. A. (2000). Collision Avoidance Analysis for Lane Changing and Merging. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 49 (6), 2295–2308. https://doi.org/10.1109/25.901899

6. de Waard D., Dijksterhuis C., Brookhuis K. A. (2009). Merging into heavy motorway traffic by young and elderly drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(3), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.011

7. Maag C., Muhlbacher D., Mark C., Kruger H.-P. (2012). Studying Effects of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) on Individual and Group Level Using Multi-Driver Simulation. 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 4(3), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/ivs.2011.5940419

8. Cheng Y., Gao L., Zhao Y., Du F. (2016). Drivers’ visual characteristics when merging onto or exiting an urban expressway. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0162298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162298

9. Salman Ahmed M., Hoque M. A., Rios-Torres J., Khattak A. J. (2018). A Cooperative Freeway Merge Assistance System using Connected Vehicles. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00508

10. Rios-Torres J., Malikopoulos A. A. (2017). Automated and Cooperative Vehicle Merging at Highway On-Ramps. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18 (4), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2016.2587582

11. Milanes V., Godoy J., Villagra J., Perez J. (2011). Automated On-Ramp Merging System for Congested Traffic Situations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12 (2), 500–508. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2010.2096812

12. Jiménez F., Naranjo J. E., Sanchez-Mateo S., Serradilla F., Pérez E., Hernández M. J., Ruiz T. (2018). Communications and Driver Monitoring Aids for Fostering SAE Level-4 Road Vehicles Automation. Electronics, 7 (10), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics7100228.

13. Sakr A. H., Bansal G., Vladimerou V., Kusano K., Johnson M. (2017). V2V and onboard sensor fusion for road geometry estimation. 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). https://doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2017.8317876

14. Dey K. C., Rayamajhi A., Chowdhury M., Bhavsar P., Martin J. (2016). Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication in a heterogeneous wireless network-Performance evaluation q. Transportation Research Part C, 68, 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.03.008

15. Jimenez F., Liang Y., Aparicio F. (2012). Adapting ISA system warnings to enhance user acceptance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 48, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.017

16. Burgett A., Carter A., Preziotti G. (2001). An algorithm for read-end collision avoidance warning systems. 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Amsterdam, 4-7 June 2001.

17. Prestl W., Sauer T., Steinle J., Tschernoster O. (2000). The BMW active cruise control ACC. SAE Technical Paper Series, nº 2000-01-0344. https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-0344

18. Green M. (2000). How Long Does It Take to Stop? Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times. Transportation Human Factors, 2 (3), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1207/sthf0203_1

19. Ahmed M. S., Hoque M. A., Rios-Torres J., Khattak A. J. (2018) A Cooperative Freeway Merge Assistance System using Connected Vehicles. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00508v1