System for Ensuring Social and Economic Security of Industrial Sector

Methodological basis for formation of system to ensure social and economic security make provisions for specific features of industrial sector. It is proposed to reflect specificity of its protection with the help of methodological and operational fundamentals. Methodological fundamentals have been formulated on the basis of functional specificity for ensuring social and economic security of the industrial sector which was determined with the help of research process. They create a perimeter for ensuring social and economic security which is formed by expectations of the society from defense system of the country’s industrial sector. Operational fundamentals complement functional specificity of the system for ensuring social and economic security through formation of a specific institutional framework. The framework includes the following components: modeling presupposing multivariance in escalation of adverse events in the industrial sector and methods for its evaluation; instrumental assistance which takes into account necessity for instrumental diversity in order to implement defense functions in changing criteria (environment of industrial sector functioning, its structure and state of inter-element relations); functional consistency as a requirement to balance targets for ensuring social and economic security of the industrial sector with objectives and values pertaining to formation of the country’s industrial sector which are fixed in program documents of the state.

1. Senko A. N. (2002) Problems on Measuring Country’s Economic Security. Gosudarstvennoe Upravlenie: Transformatsionnye Protsessy v Sovremennom Mire: Materialy Mezhdunar. Nauch.-Prakt. Konf., Minsk, 29–30 Yanv. 2002 g. Chast' 1 [Government Control: Transformation Processes in the Modern World: Proceedings of International Scientific and Practical Conference, Minsk, Jan. 29–30, 2002. Part 1]. Minsk, Academy of Public Administration under the Aegies of the President of the Republic of Belarus, 140–142 (in Russian).

2. Senko A. N. (2002) Economic Interests in Mechanism of Nation Self-Development and Problems of their Protection. Problemy Demografii i Bezopasnosti Zhizni: Materialy Mezhdunar. Kongr., Minsk, 14–15 Noyab. 2002 g. [Problems of Demography and Life Security: Proceedings of International Congress, Minsk, Nov. 14–15, 2002]. Minsk, 180–182 (in Russian).

3. Babosov E. M. (2006) Sociology of Personality, Stratification and Management. Minsk, Belorusskaya Nauka Publ. 590 (in Russian).

4. Geyzler P. S., Zavyalova O. V. (2005) Project Management. Minsk, Belorusskaya Nauka Publ. 255 (in Russian).

5. Gradov A. P. (2001) Country’s Economic Security and Priorities in Investment Policy. Ekomicheskaya Nauka Sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia, (3), 70–78 (in Russian).

6. Shvayba D. N. (2017) Problems on Coordination of Targets and Life Interests while Providing Social and Economic Security. Nauka i Tekhnika = Science and Technique, 16 (6), 526–531 (in Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10. 21122/2227-1031-2017-16-6-526-531.

7. Shvayba D. N. (2017) Analysis of Social and Economic Security Components. Problemy Upravleniya = Issues of Public Administration, 65 (3), 96–102 (in Russian).

8. Senko A. N., Medvedev V. F. (ed.) (2004) Economic Security of Industrial Complex. Minsk, Pravo i Ekonomika Publ. 225 (in Russian).

9. Senko A. N., Medvedev V. F. (ed.) (2005) Formation of System for Provision of Economic Security in Industrial Complex of the Republic of Belarus. Minsk, Pravo i Ekonomika Publ. 114 (in Russian).

10. Haishan Fu [et al.] (2005) Human Development Report, 2005. International Cooperation at a Crossroads: Aid, Trade and Security in an Unequal World. Vol. XVI. Moscow, Ves Mir Publ. 398 (in Russian).