Systematic Analysis of Indicators for Socio-Economic Security

Conducting a systematic analysis of indicators for socio-economic security it is necessary to point out that fundamental groups of characteristics pertaining to socio-economic security include the following indicators: social standard and quality of living, degree of socio-economic system security, level of national financial independence, situation with management system and provision of socio-economic security. All the mentioned and some other indicators have something in common while ensuring socio-economic security and, for this reason, it is important to keep their balance and coherence. Evaluation of socio-economic security for a macro-system can be implemented among other tasks while using matrix method. According to this method it is possible to evaluate a possibility of threat appearance due to changes in a specific indicator, level of impact on national security, duration and time rate of changes in unwanted manifestations. The matrix makes it possible to classify those dangers when there is a possibility of an unsafe situation occurrence to such extent that it is required to undertake urgent measures to improve the situation and take special actions. The proposed method demonstrates visible results and it is considered as a statistical method of analysis. The given method presents rather good results while making smooth changes in evolutionary characteristics of the system. Monitoring horizon of these models is 1–2 years. In this context it is necessary to take into account that the proposed method is hardly suitable in the case when there are prompt changes in characteristics from one group of indicators to the other one. This is due to the fact that statistics of past periods has been applied and it characterized the given system which was under completely different circumstances at that moment. If this is the case then there is a discrepancy in creation of methods at all levels of socio-economic systems and these methods adequately take into account dynamics of changes in the system.

1. Scenario Conditions, Basic Parameters for Forecasting Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation and Limit Levels of Prices (Tariffs) for Services of Companies in Infrastructure Sector for 2017 and Planning Period for 2018 and 2019. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://economy.gov.ru/minec/about/structure/depMacro/20160506 (Accessed 15 May 2016) (in Russian).

2. Shvaiba D. N. (2017) Main Criteria of Socio-Economic Security. Nauchnye Trudy Respublikanskogo Instituta Vysshei Shkoly: Filosofsko-Gumanitarnye Nauki: Sb. Nauch. St. [Scientific Papers of Republican Institute of Higher Education: Philosophical and Humanitarian Sciences: Collection of Scientific ?apers]. Minsk, Republican Institute of Higher Education, 16, 408–414 (in Russian).

3. Shvaiba D. N. (2017) Analysis of Components for SocioEconomic Security. Problemy Upravleniya = The Issues of Administration and Management, 65 (3), 96–102 (in Russian).

4. Shvaiba D. N. (2017) To the Problem on State SocioEconomic Security. Trud i Sotsialnye Otnosheniya = Labour and Social Relations, 141 (3), 19–24 (in Russian).

5. Shvaiba D. N. (2017) Problematic Aspects and Formation of Purposes for Provision of Demographic Security in the Republic of Belarus. Biulleten Nauki i Praktiki = Bulletin of Science and Practice, 25 (12). 492–496 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3092071.

6. Shvaiba D. N. (2017) Problems on Harmonization of Objectives and Vital Interests while Ensuring Socio-Economic Security. Nauka i Tekhnika = Science and Technology, 16 (6), 526–531 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21122/22271031-2017-16-6-526-531.

7. Shestak V. P. (2016) Public-Private Partnership, “Triple Helix” and Corporative Social Responsibility. Vestnik Finansovogo Universiteta = Bulletin of Finance University, 20 (4), 6–16 (in Russian).

8. Kulik Yu. P., Moskovtsev V. V., Merkulova E. Yu. (2015) Social Consequences of Structural and Institutional Deformation of Russian Economic Security System. Sotsial'noEkonomicheskie Yavleniya i Protsessy = Social and Economic Phenomena and Processes, 10 (10), 76–81 (in Russian).

9. Stolypin Club (2015) Economics Growth. Expert Online. Available at: http://expert.ru/data/public/499741/499785/dir-polnaya-versiya-19_10_15.pdf (Accessed 16 May 2016) (in Russian).

10. Vakhtina M. A. (2016) Social Justice as a Factor of Economic Development. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika = Perm University Herald. Economy, 4, 22–30 (in Russian).

11. Arkhipov A. I., Belousov A. R., Belousov R. A., Senchagov V. K. (1998) Economic Security: Production – Finance – Banks. Moscow, Finstatinform Publ. 621 (in Russian).

12. Yaroshevich V. I. (2015) Conceptual fundamentals of Strengthening Investment Potential of the Republic of Belarus. Bankovskii Vestnik = Bank Bulletin Magazine, (6), 17–21 (in Russian).

13. Markosyan A. H. (2005) To Assessment of Economic and Social Reforms in the CIS countries. Problemy Sovremennoy Ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics, (3/4), 119–126 (in Russian).

14. Vladimirov V. A., Vorob'ev Yu. L., Salov S. S. (2000) Risk Control: Risk. Sustainable Development. Synergy. Moscow, Nauka Publ. 429 (in Russian).

15. Gusev V. S., Kuzin B. I., Mednikov M. D., Sokolitsyn A. S., Stepashin S. V., Fedotov A. V., Shul'ts V. L. (2004) Economt and Organization of Security in Economic Entities. 2nd ed. Saint-Petersburg, Piter Publ. 288 (in Russian).

16. Osipov G. V. (2003) Report at the 2nd All-Russian Congress of Sociologists, September 23–26, 2003, Moscow State University. Available at: http://www.ispr.ru/Confer/confer16-2.html (Accessed 1 September 2017) (in Russian).

17. Sokolova G. N. (2010) Economic Reality in Social Dimension: Economic Conclusions and Social Responses. Minsk, Belaruskaya Navuka Publ. 458 (in Russian).