Preview

Science & Technique

Advanced search

QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION BY URBAN TRANSPORT WHILE USING VARIOUS NUMBER OF FIXED-ROUTE TRANSPORT FACILITIES

https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2017-16-5-415-421

Abstract

The quality of services which are offered by urban passenger transport determines a living standard of country’s inhabitants. The executed analysis of methods for quality assessment of passenger transportation service by urban transport has shown that it is expedient to use complex indices for such assessment. The existing methods for quality assessment of urban passenger transport do not fully take into account subjective passengers’ evaluation of service quality criteria. The investigations conducted with the purpose to estimate significance of quality assessment criteria pertaining to urban pas-senger transport operation for passengers have made it possible to formalize importance of the given significance. A complex index of urban passenger transport quality has been prepared that includes such isolated quality indicators as pedestrian mo-tion component, waiting time, travel time, dynamic factor of capacity usage. It has been determined that it is possible to plan quality of passenger transportation while using transport process simulation. Influence of technological parameters on quality parameters can be determined with the help of the developed simulation model for quality assessment of transportation pro-cess on route of urban passenger transport. While using the simulation model regularities in changing a complex quality index of urban passenger transport have been analyzed according to number of transport facilities operating on route. Simulation results have shown that changes in number of transport facilities significantly exert an influence on the value of dynamic fac-tor of transport facility capacity usage, waiting time for transport facility and time travel. This leads to changes in quality of transportation process. Analysis of the obtained results has permitted to make a conclusion that every route with certain parameters has such rational number of transport facilities that ensures maximum efficiency of urban passenger transport with appropriate quality. It has been revealed that any change in number of transport facilities is described with a reasonable degree of accuracy by a nonlinear regression equation where parameters of transport facilities, passenger traffic flows and route are used as independent variables. 

About the Authors

I. V. Chumachenko
O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv
Ukraine
Address for correspondence:  Chumachenko Igor V. – O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, 17 Marshal Bazhanov str., 61002, Kharkiv, Ukraine . Tel.: +38 057 707-31-32    pmkaf@kname.edu.ua


Yu. A. Davidich
O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv
Ukraine

Professor, PhD in Engineering



A. S. Galkin
O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv
Ukraine
PhD in Engineering


N. V. Davidich
O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv
Ukraine
Graduate student


References

1. Cronin J. J., Taylor S. A. (1992). Measuring Service Quality: a Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56 (3), 55–68. DOI: 10.2307/1252296

2. Parasuraman A. V., Zeithaml A., Berry L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12–37.

3. Gudkov V. A., Mirotin L. B. (1997). Technology, organization and management of passenger road transport. Moscow, Transport Publ. 312 (in Russian).

4. Bolshakov A. M., Kravchenko E. A., Tchernikova S. L. (1981). Improvement of quality in service of passengers and efficiency of bus operation. Moscow, Transport Publ. 206 (in Russian).

5. Tarkhanova N. V. (2009). Analysis of quality indices for passenger transportation. Sovershenstvovanie organizatsii dorozhnogo dvizheniya i perevozka passazhirov i gruzov: sb. nauch. statei Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Improvement in organization of road traffic and passenger and cargo transportation: Collection of Research Papers – International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Minsk, Belarusian National Technical University, 33–38 (in Russian).

6. Beirão G. Cabral J.S. (2006). Enhancing Service Quality in Public Transport Systems. Faculty of Engineering. XII: Urban Transport and the Environment in the 21st Century, .837–845.

7. Gamula P. R. (2004). Metrology, Standardization, Quality Control and Certification. Lviv, Publishing House of Lviv Polytechnic National University. 506 (in Ukrainian).

8. Friman M., Fellesson M. (2009). Service Supply and Customer Satisfaction in Public Transportation: the Quality Paradox. Journal of Public Transportation, 12 (4), 57–69. DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.4

9. Davidich N. V., Tchumachenko I. V. (2016). Monitoring for influence of urban passenger transport parameters on public service quality. Komunal'ne gospodarstvo m?st: zb. nauk. pr. Ser.: Tekhn?chn? nauki ta arkh?tektura [Urban communal services: Collection of Research Papers. Series: Engineering Sciences and Architecture], (128), 89–93 (in Ukrainian).

10. Dolya V. K. (1993). Theoretical principles and methods for organization of express bus transportation of passengers in large cities. Moscow, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University. 301 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Chumachenko I.V., Davidich Yu.A., Galkin A.S., Davidich N.V. QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION BY URBAN TRANSPORT WHILE USING VARIOUS NUMBER OF FIXED-ROUTE TRANSPORT FACILITIES. Science & Technique. 2017;16(5):415-421. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2017-16-5-415-421

Views: 2554


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-1031 (Print)
ISSN 2414-0392 (Online)